Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/10/08 09:17
Read: times


 
#155662 - I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi everyone,
I have two updates to make and I am sure everyone will be happy to hear them:

1. It has been a few days since I successfully deciphered the serial protocol between the windows SW and the board. And also created a linux port of the same. Yeah it works, too! ;-) But what I did is NOT illegal. Why? Read on.

2. I called up the sales representative of the vendor (who sold me their board) and offered to write a linux port for free, after signing an NDA if necessary. But what he told me was even better.

It seems their product does not include any 'propreitary' protocol.
The protocol is documented at http://www.kmitl.ac.th/~kswichit...2work.html

After having a look at it, I realized it was indeed the same thing that I managed to 'reverse-engineer'.

I already spoke with with the maintainer of the webpage mentioned above webpage and he consented to use his 'protocol'.

Soon I shall release the source code of my linux programmer along with a GUI client if possible. The command line client is already operational though ;-)

The other good news is, since this is a generic protocol, anyone using the easy-uploader(as in the webpage above) could use my linux port because the underlying protocol is same.


Thanks a lot for your help in answering my queries patiently.

regards,
Seemanta



List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool            01/01/70 00:00      
   Legality?            01/01/70 00:00      
   excerpt from the license agreement...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why not read Atmel's app notes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends on which words do you want to stress            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol            01/01/70 00:00      
         strange admission            01/01/70 00:00      
            it means I am not a lawyer            01/01/70 00:00      
               then why did he not write that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's an acronym from the same era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have never understood ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        on communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                           my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 the few -or- the many?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The few            01/01/70 00:00      
   will 'whine' not do?            01/01/70 00:00      
   VBox?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Did you mean 'wine'?            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, I ment whine            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got that later on from your next post            01/01/70 00:00      
   twen it would not be porting            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Oft forgotten            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for your encouragement, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            one final comment            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sharing source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         irrelevant - and not true            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....            01/01/70 00:00      
   ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List