Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/09/08 22:39
Read: times


 
#155641 - Protocol
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Seemanta Dutta said:
Here is an excerpt from their license agreement:

"You may not distribute, copy, emulate, clone, rent, lease and sell the program. Also, you may not modify, decompile, disassemble, otherwise reverse engineer, or transfer the program, or any subset of the program, except to the extent and for the express purposes authorized by applicable law. Any such unauthorised use shall result in immediate and automatic termination of this licence and may result in criminal or civil prosecution. "


IANAL but I'm pretty sure that the "emulate" and "clone" parts wouldn't stand up in court. If you can decipher the serial data between the Windows app and the board, you have every right to produce a Linux, or other OS, app that will generate the same data.

It's been done for other types of hardware without any legal problems.

What I detect in their license agreement is some over-eager lawyer trying to scare people into believing they can't breathe without his company's permission. Much like EULAs I've seen that "prohibit" anyone from giving a bad review of the product. No one, not government nor corporations, has the right to muzzle freedom of speech.



List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool            01/01/70 00:00      
   Legality?            01/01/70 00:00      
   excerpt from the license agreement...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why not read Atmel's app notes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends on which words do you want to stress            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol            01/01/70 00:00      
         strange admission            01/01/70 00:00      
            it means I am not a lawyer            01/01/70 00:00      
               then why did he not write that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's an acronym from the same era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have never understood ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        on communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                           my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 the few -or- the many?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The few            01/01/70 00:00      
   will 'whine' not do?            01/01/70 00:00      
   VBox?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Did you mean 'wine'?            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, I ment whine            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got that later on from your next post            01/01/70 00:00      
   twen it would not be porting            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Oft forgotten            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for your encouragement, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            one final comment            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sharing source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         irrelevant - and not true            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....            01/01/70 00:00      
   ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List