Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 06/10/08 10:09 Read: times	#155668 - then why did he not write that Responding to: ???'s previous message

List of 33 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool		01/01/70 00:00
Legality?		01/01/70 00:00
excerpt from the license agreement...		01/01/70 00:00
Why not read Atmel's app notes.		01/01/70 00:00
it depends on which words do you want to stress		01/01/70 00:00
Protocol		01/01/70 00:00
strange admission		01/01/70 00:00
it means I am not a lawyer		01/01/70 00:00
then why did he not write that		01/01/70 00:00
it's an acronym from the same era ...		01/01/70 00:00
I have never understood ...		01/01/70 00:00
on communication		01/01/70 00:00
my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff		01/01/70 00:00
Ridiculous		01/01/70 00:00
the few -or- the many?		01/01/70 00:00
The few		01/01/70 00:00
will 'whine' not do?		01/01/70 00:00
VBox?		01/01/70 00:00
Did you mean 'wine'?		01/01/70 00:00
no, I ment whine		01/01/70 00:00
I got that later on from your next post		01/01/70 00:00
twen it would not be porting		01/01/70 00:00
I have to agree ...		01/01/70 00:00
Oft forgotten		01/01/70 00:00
Thanks for your encouragement, but		01/01/70 00:00
one final comment		01/01/70 00:00
Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer		01/01/70 00:00
Sharing source code		01/01/70 00:00
irrelevant - and not true		01/01/70 00:00
I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!		01/01/70 00:00
back to the future		01/01/70 00:00
Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....		01/01/70 00:00
ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List