Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/13/02 13:41
Read: times


 		 #29134 - RE: Defining base address
why not get rid of the 8255 altogether and build the desired functions in the CPLD
As I said, thanks for the second.

Erik

List of 22 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List