Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/14/02 18:02
Read: times


 
#29170 - RE: Defining base address


erik malund wrote:
-------------------------------
If you are willing to put a 5 (or is it less) xtal in your design, I believe you may be able to use a 82.. chip witout problems.

hi;
i had used at 8Mhz.it did not give read/write problems.but initialization was a headache.i had to wait in idle loop before it was getting reset.
pranav

List of 22 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List