Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/14/02 15:48
Read: times


 		 #29166 - RE: Defining base address
I agree they have their problems, but the "use a CPLD" "use a bunch of latches" solutions are nothing like as straightforward. I used 8255 happily for many years, with no great problems in my applications. OK, so they may not have been as fast or sophisticated as yours, but they worked.

Steve

List of 22 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address..Thanks Eric            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8255 - great building block.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Defining base address            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: clarification (Philips reply above)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List