| ??? 03/21/05 13:52 Read: times |
#90108 - Murdered quote Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"True, but ISO/IEC 9899:1990 also says, "A 'plain' int object has the natural size suggested by the architecture of the execution environment..."
So there's clearly a conflict here for any 8-bit processor! Presumably, compiler implementors just have to decide which rule to break." There is no conflict. You chopped off the second half of the quote from the standard, which is: ...'(large enough to contain any value in the range INT_MIN to INT_MAX as defined in the header <limits.h>).' This statement would certainly have been clearer if the words 'that is' were inserted between the two halves, but is nonetheless definitive. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Problems with PCF8574 input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| best guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Jez Smith | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| show the code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmmmmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFDS - using 8574 IO as inputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To J. Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| When is pin written ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My datasheet tells something different.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cutting through the fog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To J. Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where is the difference between... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Problems with PCF8574 input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test it without having any communication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe good guess! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Medhi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Switch terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coonfoosed yeeet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Contact arrangement - nothing else | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PCF8574 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Ben | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have used the bugger often | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| helloooooooooo !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wager... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Grant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats told 'em :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frightend... ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Formatting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Format flavours. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insanity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Malaysian Grand Prix... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some update!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let me comment.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "fancy" code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll Suggest... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pointers and structures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C assumes int | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Followed the advice of Michael Karas... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not assembly using? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembler code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| int | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check Maxint ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Murdered quote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I2C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil webpage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i2c simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me to blame? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not blaming you! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Michael B. made a very usefull tool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hello | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not aware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank u | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Name confusion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Damned, damned, damned... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pls. do so! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keyboard Calico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Christmas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe it was .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Christmas Presents | 01/01/70 00:00 |