??? 05/03/05 21:03 Read: times |
#92839 - re could it be? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi erik,
I opend Hyperterminal and sent some characters, the respond is the echo of same character, so it means that the XOR is not executed, thats why it is so strange to me. any other toughts? Best regards, khaled |
Topic | Author | Date |
ISP-AES(or other tiny encryption)for LPC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so it works? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re so it works? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
could it be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re could it be? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
double-xor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LPC935 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tea time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TEA time ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More tea![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Please clarify requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what i want, Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Looks like you are set then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: to Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mode of operation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I underdstand now., thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
better done in hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what are you making | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
theft has to be prevented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
either or | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FM is just a "vehicle"... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but a diesel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's easy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
again, why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unsecure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Individual sector security bits removal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
lockbits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now i understand! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what am i making? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why GSM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for the xor method to work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RC4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RC4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A reminder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
encryption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pgpi.org | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok thanks jez | 01/01/70 00:00 |