| ??? 05/04/05 07:08 Read: times |
#92862 - RC4 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thank you very much Jez,
I was aware of it that XOR can be cracked within minutes as i mentioned. But this was only the beginning. I wanted to disrupt The ISP code by just changing the recieved byte by the ISP to something different then the other routines in the ISP use, so the protocol then will not be correct. FM should then not be able to communicate. And strange enough, even i change the ISP code still nothing is changed.FM can communicate very well and also programs the Hex file as if the recieved bytes were not changed. I think that speed is not a matter, just a bit of security. Thanks to Dan he told me about the TEA encryption method which is very posible to implement in the ISP code as it is not so big and is not been cracked tell now. I hope that some master will write an ISP code for The LPC family with the encryption. Best regards to all Khaled |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ISP-AES(or other tiny encryption)for LPC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so it works? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re so it works? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| could it be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re could it be? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| double-xor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LPC935 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tea time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TEA time ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More tea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please clarify requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what i want, Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looks like you are set then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: to Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mode of operation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I underdstand now., thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better done in hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what are you making | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| theft has to be prevented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| either or | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FM is just a "vehicle"... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but a diesel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's easy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| again, why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unsecure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Individual sector security bits removal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lockbits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now i understand! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what am i making? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why GSM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for the xor method to work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A reminder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| encryption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pgpi.org | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok thanks jez | 01/01/70 00:00 |