??? 06/10/05 14:11 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#94617 - Ultrasonic Signal Processing |
Hello:
This is the ultrasonic signal. Received singal will be preamp, and feed to ADC (TLC548). MPU is ATMEL89S52 or 89C2051. This is the amplified signal: ![]() I'm trying Ultrasonic ranging. I don't mean to calculate exactly the distance in "cm" or "m". I just want to have a number from 0 to 255, represents a range that I design, for example, 255 = 2m, 0 = 0m. I can sucessfully convert the echo into a number between 0 and 255. But my question is, when the object is near, the signal is usually significant but when the the object is far away from the sensor the signal is very weak, which means that there is no absolute level of "signal higher then 'this' is the echo signal". How to write a program to detect the greatest echo within the "2 meter time", beside using a comparator? I've written a program like this: Transmitt the ultrasonic pulses, and start a timer which INC a variable every 70uS. The MPU keeps comparing the incoming signal from the ADC with the previous result. If the new one is greater then the previous one, I keep the new one as the "greatest" and save the copy of the "variable INCing by the timer", until the end of "2 meter time". After the "2m time", the "variable" should be containing the time of which the largest echo comes. But the program doesn't work well. LED keeps flashing as if the distance is changing frequently. For these "time dependent" program I don't know how to debug... How would you work out the time between "Transmit" and "Echo @ 2m"? I mean the "program flow"? "the Logic" Sorry, after resize the notes becomes barely visible... and for my poor english which I can't use it well to express my meaning. Just ask my questions if it is not clear, please. Thanks~ Stanley |
Topic | Author | Date |
Ultrasonic Signal Processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time dependant gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Further attenuation... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signal recovery. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AGC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AGC as Steve said// | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ultrasonic Ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Matched filter on the rescue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
matched filters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Phase locked amplifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its a different thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thats the one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clever woman | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just an idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The scope plot tells it all! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Largest signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'Greatest' echo is the wrong criterion! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | |
somehow I remember... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oops~ forgot... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Power of transmission pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Preamp circuit Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Add caps to remove base line noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another potential problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem with ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
possible solution to the ADC problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok~ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Debug Result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ADC Sampling and code debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sampling time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Adc for Ultrasonic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Next, comes to "average" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why use the adc? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Forgot to tell... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circle in RED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Asking for help again - Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Notch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DSP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for the sake of learning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Op amps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
100pF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bypass ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No sort of bypass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BTE054 BTE054USS2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better noise control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: BTE054 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Replace LMV6032 with LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:low sensitivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:no filtering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Notch filter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bandpass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOT a criticism | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Update... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Umm... Nowadays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Op amp parameters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Filters for Dummy" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Have you tried it with ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, I've tried it and it works well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Basic electronics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
0.002uF -> 3300uF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
test of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's over 1.2m | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TWO bypass caps. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Two were found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Usenet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why using a PLL, when a bandpass can ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which is why ,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not sure what you meant.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But it MUST work properly!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Op-amp to replace LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Non-inverting Input Voltage Divider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LM567 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:wrong link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: no AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LMC6032 is much more linear than LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:attenuation of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good ones and bad ones | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another article of interest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tramsmit & receive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how to measure the distance perfectly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about this one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ultrasonic Detection Code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is that right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not right,,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another missing! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i'll try it.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some Applications of ultrasonic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Op amps for everyone" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
woo... tiring trip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is it not fundamentally wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I knew that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Synthetic grounds | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Steve, Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The circuit works, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Moral | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Puh, what antennas... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which means I can't use breadboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In one word. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Using the LM318 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Missing 10K | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Parallel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does it work now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it works fine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Theoretical work missed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another article to peruse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why sorry? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's exactly what I want to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which one is the best way? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Capacitors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i've got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not the best solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Laser ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've withdrawn from the competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOT finance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: money is not everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good Luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The noise again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is the link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
5-14 Khz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:5-14kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Noise Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the problem is gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1/4Watt is enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simulation result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Strange plots... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about Compensation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bigger Pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bridge configuration can help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The same circuit but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
...but much stronger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have tried | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What do you mean by ripple? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The ripple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, it is not. The output from a logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yup Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's to adjust oscillating frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finished![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exams VS academic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Plan B" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Universities in HongKong | 01/01/70 00:00 |