| ??? 07/31/05 11:02 Read: times |
#98505 - ...but much stronger Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Pradono said:
By the way, I have decoupling the supply with Tantalum capasitor(0,1uF). Tanatlum capacitors aren't good enough for that job, because equivalent series resistance is way too high when using 0.1µF! Try 100nF/X7R (ceramics), this one is much better. You can even increase the capacitance a bit. And you should use it in combination with a solid ground plane or at least heavy and wide copper traces! I think 4001(CMOS NOR GATE) is better then 7402 because the VDD can be adjustable until 15V, so the high ouput(voltage) range will reach 5 until 14V. Isn't it? If there's only 5V, then the 74HC02 is better. (Take care it's not 7402, but 74HC02!) Why? Because there's a hidden output impedance with 4001 of about 500 Ohm per output. This impedance would decrease the current through ultrasonic transmitter. 74HC02 only shows about 50 Ohm output impedance. More, the 74HC02 is much more robust than 4001. If higher supply voltages are available, then you can use CMOS4000 series. But choose a special buffer for the driving of ultrasonic transmitter. And connect several of them in parallel. Nevertheless, because these chips aren't very robust, you would still need a current limiting resistor. In order to prevent 'hogging' (only one output provides all the current and gets possibly damaged), you should provide a suited current limiting resistor at each output and connect the outputs in parallel behind the resistors. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Ultrasonic Signal Processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time dependant gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further attenuation... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal recovery. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC as Steve said// | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ultrasonic Ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Matched filter on the rescue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| matched filters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Phase locked amplifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its a different thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats the one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clever woman | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just an idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The scope plot tells it all! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Largest signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Greatest' echo is the wrong criterion! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| somehow I remember... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops~ forgot... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Power of transmission pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Preamp circuit Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Add caps to remove base line noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another potential problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem with ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible solution to the ADC problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok~ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debug Result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ADC Sampling and code debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sampling time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Adc for Ultrasonic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Next, comes to "average" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use the adc? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forgot to tell... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Circle in RED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asking for help again - Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Notch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for the sake of learning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op amps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100pF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bypass ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No sort of bypass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BTE054 BTE054USS2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better noise control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: BTE054 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Replace LMV6032 with LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:low sensitivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:no filtering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Notch filter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bandpass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT a criticism | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Update... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Umm... Nowadays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op amp parameters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Filters for Dummy" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you tried it with ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I've tried it and it works well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic electronics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0.002uF -> 3300uF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's over 1.2m | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TWO bypass caps. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two were found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Usenet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why using a PLL, when a bandpass can ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which is why ,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not sure what you meant.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But it MUST work properly!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Circuit here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op-amp to replace LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Non-inverting Input Voltage Divider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LM567 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:wrong link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: no AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LMC6032 is much more linear than LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:attenuation of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good ones and bad ones | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another article of interest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tramsmit & receive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to measure the distance perfectly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about this one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ultrasonic Detection Code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right,,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another missing! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i'll try it.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some Applications of ultrasonic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Op amps for everyone" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| woo... tiring trip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is it not fundamentally wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I knew that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synthetic grounds | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Steve, Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The circuit works, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moral | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Puh, what antennas... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which means I can't use breadboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In one word. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using the LM318 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Missing 10K | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parallel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does it work now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it works fine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Theoretical work missed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another article to peruse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why sorry? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's exactly what I want to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which one is the best way? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Capacitors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i've got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the best solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Laser ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've withdrawn from the competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT finance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: money is not everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good Luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The noise again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is the link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 5-14 Khz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:5-14kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Noise Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the problem is gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1/4Watt is enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulation result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strange plots... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Compensation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bigger Pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bridge configuration can help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The same circuit but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...but much stronger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have tried | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you mean by ripple? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The ripple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it is not. The output from a logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yup Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's to adjust oscillating frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finished | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exams VS academic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Plan B" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Universities in HongKong | 01/01/70 00:00 |