| ??? 06/26/05 14:26 Read: times |
#95960 - how to measure the distance perfectly? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi everyone,
I am making ultrasonic rangemeter with 89s52 now. I have made the receiver circuit(it's contains of amplifier circuit using LM318 and tone decoder using LM567) and LM567 output is fed up to the microcontroller(pin1.1) And this my code to send out ultrasonic wave and wait for the reflected signal. im using 11,059Mhz xtal. im using Timer0 interupt every 50ms ( and waiting for 1second to send out the ultrasonic pulse and then wait for the reflected signal) TR1 as a timer..(when the pulse has send out until i get back) ;-------------------------------------------------------------; PULSE: SETB TR1 JNB TF1,$ ;start send the 40khz SEND_OUT: SETB TRANSMIT NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP CLR TRANSMIT NOP NOP ;40,06KHZ NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP NOP JB RECEIVE,SEND_OUT ;wait until receive the reflected signal STABLE: JB TF1,CONVERSION ;CEK THE OVERFLOW JB RECEIVE,STABLE CONVERSION: CLR TR1 CLR TF1 MOV TH1X,TH1 MOV TL1X,TL1 MOV TH1,#00H MOV TL1,#00H CALL DIV58 CALL BCD_CONV SETB TR0 RETI ;--------------------------------------------------------------; Until i get the reflected signal i will stop the TR1 and start the conversion to the distance and displayed with 4 digits seven segment(common cathode). The problem is : My data in seven segment always change(never stable eventhough i measure the same distance) why it could be happened? anybody can help me? Kindest regards Anto |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Ultrasonic Signal Processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time dependant gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further attenuation... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal recovery. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC as Steve said// | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My Algorithm was: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ultrasonic Ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Matched filter on the rescue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| matched filters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Phase locked amplifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its a different thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats the one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clever woman | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just an idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The scope plot tells it all! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Largest signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Greatest' echo is the wrong criterion! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| somehow I remember... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops~ forgot... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Power of transmission pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Preamp circuit Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Add caps to remove base line noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another potential problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem with ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible solution to the ADC problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok~ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debug Result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ADC Sampling and code debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sampling time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Adc for Ultrasonic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Next, comes to "average" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use the adc? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forgot to tell... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Circle in RED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asking for help again - Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Notch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for the sake of learning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op amps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100pF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bypass ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No sort of bypass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BTE054 BTE054USS2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better noise control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: BTE054 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Replace LMV6032 with LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:low sensitivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:no filtering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Notch filter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bandpass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT a criticism | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Update... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Umm... Nowadays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op amp parameters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Filters for Dummy" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you tried it with ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I've tried it and it works well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic electronics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0.002uF -> 3300uF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's over 1.2m | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TWO bypass caps. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two were found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Usenet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why using a PLL, when a bandpass can ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which is why ,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not sure what you meant.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But it MUST work properly!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Circuit here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Op-amp to replace LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Non-inverting Input Voltage Divider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LM567 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:wrong link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: no AGC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LMC6032 is much more linear than LM324 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:attenuation of signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good ones and bad ones | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another article of interest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tramsmit & receive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to measure the distance perfectly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about this one.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ultrasonic Detection Code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right,,,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another missing! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i'll try it.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some Applications of ultrasonic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Op amps for everyone" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| woo... tiring trip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is it not fundamentally wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I knew that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synthetic grounds | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Steve, Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The circuit works, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moral | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Puh, what antennas... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which means I can't use breadboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In one word. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using the LM318 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Missing 10K | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parallel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does it work now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it works fine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Theoretical work missed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fatal Error! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another article to peruse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why sorry? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's exactly what I want to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which one is the best way? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Capacitors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i've got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the best solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Laser ranging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've withdrawn from the competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT finance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: money is not everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good Luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The noise again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is the link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 5-14 Khz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:5-14kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Noise Amplitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the problem is gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1/4Watt is enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulation result | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strange plots... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Compensation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bigger Pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bridge configuration can help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The same circuit but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...but much stronger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have tried | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you mean by ripple? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The ripple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it is not. The output from a logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yup Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's to adjust oscillating frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finished | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exams VS academic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Plan B" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Universities in HongKong | 01/01/70 00:00 |