Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/05/07 15:47
Modified:
  02/05/07 15:47
Read: times


 		 #132051 - this is not taste, but facts
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Fact is that the information in both documents overlap in cca 80% (I have yet find the key for how is the remaining 20% split up - numbers are mostly in the datasheet but there is more than just that).

And you need to read BOTH if you want to use it. That means, you have to read 180% of what would be absolutely necessary.

For me, it means waste of time.

This left, well, BAD taste... :-)

JW

PS. I bought some samples and planned to play with them but after reading of DS/UM thought better not...


List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
min reset width?            01/01/70 00:00      
   WHY            01/01/70 00:00      
      why?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Which reset chip, and how long a pulse?            01/01/70 00:00      
      "proper supervisor"?            01/01/70 00:00      
         so why ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Data Sheet vs User Manual            01/01/70 00:00      
               Data Sheet vs User Manual            01/01/70 00:00      
               wherizit?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Which uP are you looking at?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     P89LPC932A1            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Hey! Where'd you get Rev 2?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's it: I said, it is not in the datasheet/UM!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Webmaster? They have a webmaster?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Only at 5V...            01/01/70 00:00      
         words, words            01/01/70 00:00      
   Does it not have an internal Reset circuit?            01/01/70 00:00      
      now THIS is a BAD documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
         Does it imply            01/01/70 00:00      
            infernal reset (not a typo!)            01/01/70 00:00      
               So, what's the "right" way?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  don't use it as a port pin            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's not a pitty but a shame!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it's "creeping feature"-ism            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not a waste            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, I remember those many complaints!!            01/01/70 00:00      
         And what about...            01/01/70 00:00      
            internally timed            01/01/70 00:00      
               I LOVE it            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OK so let's vote            01/01/70 00:00      
                     no voting, please            01/01/70 00:00      
                        this is not taste, but facts            01/01/70 00:00      
   So, how's one supposed to reset this thing?            01/01/70 00:00      
   lets see...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, but what's REQUIRED?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some results            01/01/70 00:00      
      with or without the reset chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
         now with the reset chips            01/01/70 00:00      
            and the troubles were BEFORE or AFTER?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List