??? 02/21/07 09:25 Read: times |
#133400 - mux vs. pulsed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Chris Kelly said:
What I am adamant about, however, is that multiplexing/reduced duty cycle is useful for more than just "saving ICs". What Erik tries to say (among others) is, that there are reasons NOT to use multiplexing beyond the possible troubles with high current pulsed mode of operation. These are two things - multiplexing and pulsed operation - which can and maybe should be distinguished. Of course, you cannot operate a multiplexed display without pulsed operation, but you CAN pulse a non-multiplexed display, if needed... Jan Waclawek PS. There actually are LEDs which light output increases with current faster than linearly - aka superLEDs. Basically they are semiconductor lasers with deliberately or accidentally imperfect resonator (mirrors), and this effect is the result of - possibly more efficient - stimulated emission, starting to prevail above a certain threshold. However, this certainly is NOT the case of the common cheap LEDs. |