??? 02/23/07 05:47 Read: times |
#133527 - I am still CURIOUS Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
The decay isn't as effective as you might first think, and Erik's comment is probably correct for most cases. I have enought experience with muxed displays to be aware that the human eye - and brain, because that's involved in this process, too - can easily see a lot of things, even if they are not there; but I am still CURIOUS... (OK this thing seems to be a sort of a slight psychosis, doesn't it... :-) ) Richard Erlacher said:
Unfortunately, the peak charge rate is at the wrong end of the curve, so the brightness decrease coincides with the maximal recovery of the retina. I don't quite understand what do you mean. Can you please elaborate? Richard Erlacher said:
There's no single-bit memory concept involved, BTW, in what I proposed. Yes there is - in the same way as in dynamic memories. However, for multiplexed (matrix) displays, you would need capacitor parallel to a LED+resistor series combination, plus a diode in series with this all; and the concept would be the reverse - a quickly charged capacitor would slowly discharge through the LED+resistor, the diode preventing it discharging through the rest of the matrix. Jan Waclawek |