Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/29/04 08:48
Read: times


 
#69457 - RE: Keil
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Charles Bannister said:
the trouble Keil puts you thru.

Come on, Charles, you can't blame Keil for that!

The limitations of the free Evaluation version are clearly & explicitly stated here:
http://www.keil.com/demo/limits.htm
The 6th bullet point for the C51 tools:
"Programs start at offset 0x0800. Programs generated with the evaluation software may not be programmed into single-chip devices with less than 2K Bytes of on-chip ROM." (my emphasis)

Anyone who chooses to ignore this (or doesn't even bother to read it), and then wonders why it won't work in 2K-ROM cip, brings the trouble on their own head and has only themselves to blame!

List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
         Evaluation version?            01/01/70 00:00      
   STOP!            01/01/70 00:00      
      on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Evaluation version!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Keil evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Wichit Sirichote is to blame?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, to Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, t            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Optimisation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Does Size Matter?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Nope!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Comparisons            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Cross-Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Cross-Compiler, Thanks Andy            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List