Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/05/04 06:55
Read: times


 		 #69874 - Efficiency
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Charles Bannister said:
This to me would mean SDCC is 31% less efficient compared to RIDE.

Various people have speculated various reasons why SDCC might potentially be less "efficient" than other compilers.

Are there any that stand out in your results?

Can you confirm or contradict any of the earlier opinions?

List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
         Evaluation version?            01/01/70 00:00      
   STOP!            01/01/70 00:00      
      on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Evaluation version!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Keil evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Wichit Sirichote is to blame?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, to Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, t            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Optimisation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Does Size Matter?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Nope!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Comparisons            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Cross-Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Cross-Compiler, Thanks Andy            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List