Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/03/04 20:03
Read: times


 		 #69786 - RE: Learning C for \\\'51
Responding to: ???'s previous message
A little english lesson:
it is 'elaborate' not 'illaborate'


SDCC is inefficient? How to estimate efficiency of crosscompilers?
1) what IS a crosscompiler I only know what a compiler is.
2) you can't "estimate efficiency" only measure it.

I know of no way (as confirmed by the comparisons I did at that time - see above) that a 'general purpose compiler' that has been hogtied to work with the 10 types of memory the '51 has (register banks - bit addressable - direct RAM - indirect RAM - bit addressable SFR - non bit addressable SFR - dptr addressed ERAM - Rn addressed ERAM - dptr addressed XRAM - Rn addressed XRAM) can be efficient.

K & R never anticipated more than 2 types of memory, there are mentions of code in permanent storage, but that is it.

Erik



List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
         Evaluation version?            01/01/70 00:00      
   STOP!            01/01/70 00:00      
      on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Evaluation version!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Keil evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Wichit Sirichote is to blame?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, to Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, t            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Optimisation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Does Size Matter?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Nope!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Comparisons            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Cross-Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Cross-Compiler, Thanks Andy            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List