| ??? 05/05/04 14:00 Read: times |
#69894 - Nope! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Charles,
Didn't you read the preamble to my post? I said:
I'm just throwing questions in here; I'm not getting at anyone - especially not Charles, who has gone to the trouble of doing the compilations! Charles Bannister said:
Why do you have such great interest showing Keil in the positive and SDCC, RIDE in the negative? None of my posts in this thread shows any compiler in the positive or negative with respect to any other. In fact, the only specific recommendation I have made is this: I said:
I have just brought up these questions which need to asked when making any comparison between any compilers! In fact, you could take my questions here as a defence of SDCC - were you comparing like with like in your SDCC and RIDE builds? Were you using comparable optimisation, memory models, etc, etc? I have, however, been at great lengths to dispel a number of ill-founded criticisms that have been targetted at Keil - all based on a failure to understand the nature & purpose of the free Evaluation version: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=69457 |
