Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/03/04 13:37
Read: times


 		 #69733 - RE: Learning C for \'51
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"Erik please be kind enough to illaborate why you said
SDCC is inefficient?"

As Erik seems to have lost the ability to read a complete sentence I'll answer: I believe the code SDCC generates is inefficient because SDCC has been ported to the 8051 rather than written as an 8051 compiler from the ground up.

List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
         Evaluation version?            01/01/70 00:00      
   STOP!            01/01/70 00:00      
      on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: on the contrary            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Evaluation version?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Evaluation version!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Keil evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Wichit Sirichote is to blame?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Learning C for \'51            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, to Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Learning C for \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'51, t            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Optimisation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Does Size Matter?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Special Interest for Keil by Andy here?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Nope!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Comparisons            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Learning C for '51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Learning C for \\\'51            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Cross-Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Cross-Compiler, Thanks Andy            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List