??? 12/31/04 12:36 Read: times |
#84165 - More modbus Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As for the application - what data needs to be transported and how often influences the choice of protocol. Sometimes you need to be a little creative in thinking of a solution. One app I had was a sensor that outputted distance data on a regular basis and I needed to do processing that relied on the relative timing of that data. My solution was to use a queue and map that onto a set of modbus registers. The PC would read that block of modbus registers that would extract the data from the queue - thus I wasn't relying on the timing accuracy of the PC - the queue would soak up the difference. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Control system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
buses for industrial | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN or RS-485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one way of master slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Control system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
modbus or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
rs-485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rs485 vs CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
rs-485,high speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Go Speed Racer! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comments on speed and the above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Daisy chain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Daisy,Daisy..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no repeat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hub ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Modbus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
failed links![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |