| ??? 01/20/05 04:20 Read: times |
#85354 - I've seen worse! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I wouldn't suggest you don't use it - I'm sure in most applications it will work just fine, but if I was to make a commercial product I would use a MAX232/202 type device or use the old standard 1488/1489 (these are dirt cheap). You make the judgement.
|
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Instead of MAX232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dont do this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've seen worse! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hysterisis lacking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pin connectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Specs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check this Kuan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Male/Female? Pin Numbers? - DTE or DCE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Previous experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OH NO! NOT AGAIN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Receive-Only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let's analyse: Why is it wrong? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why all this excitement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's the TTL side | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah-ha! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then I apologize... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you mean this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232 Bus Input Lines of Receiver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Threshold level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Resistors work too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rf makes Schmitt-trigger performance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Works for some applications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| link, please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| found it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh tresting again | 01/01/70 00:00 |