??? 01/20/05 15:42 Read: times |
#85417 - Let's analyse: Why is it wrong? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
I have a little "receive-only" gadget that doesn't use a "proper" receiver - and, sure enough, there have been occasions where it has not worked! Andy, can you please be more specific with what these ocassions were? Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
Instead of MAX232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dont do this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've seen worse! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hysterisis lacking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pin connectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Specs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check this Kuan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Male/Female? Pin Numbers? - DTE or DCE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Previous experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OH NO! NOT AGAIN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Receive-Only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Let's analyse: Why is it wrong? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why all this excitement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's the TTL side | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ah-ha! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Then I apologize... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you mean this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS232 Bus Input Lines of Receiver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threshold level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Resistors work too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rf makes Schmitt-trigger performance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Works for some applications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
link, please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
found it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh tresting again![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |