??? 01/21/05 14:05 Read: times |
#85501 - did you mean this Responding to: ???'s previous message |
This is a circuit, that will properly work at low baud rates!
I'd say This is a circuit, that will probably work at low baud rates. Anyhow, the whole issue is that "saving the MAX232" is never a good idea. a) you do not save much and b) you never know the result. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Instead of MAX232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dont do this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've seen worse! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hysterisis lacking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pin connectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Specs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check this Kuan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Male/Female? Pin Numbers? - DTE or DCE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Previous experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OH NO! NOT AGAIN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Receive-Only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Let's analyse: Why is it wrong? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why all this excitement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's the TTL side | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ah-ha! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Then I apologize... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you mean this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS232 Bus Input Lines of Receiver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threshold level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Resistors work too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rf makes Schmitt-trigger performance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Works for some applications | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
link, please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
found it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh tresting again![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |