Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/02/05 06:40
Read: times


 
Msg Score: +1
 +1 Good Answer/Helpful		 #88843 - 0xA5 opcode
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Michael Karas said:
This concept makes no sense. If you want an NOP then use the normal opcode for the NOP. On the other hand if you want to set the CY flag simply use the already existing SETB C opcode.


I wonder if this opcode is the leftover result of some instruction-set orthogonality?

-a



List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Kitchen Drain .. Unwanted Features            01/01/70 00:00      
   13-bit Mode for Timers            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dumb A5 Opcode            01/01/70 00:00      
      0xA5 opcode            01/01/70 00:00      
         Finally room for XOR C,bit :)            01/01/70 00:00      
            MOV bit,bit            01/01/70 00:00      
      CY flag            01/01/70 00:00      
         My A5 source information....            01/01/70 00:00      
            More A5 opcode info            01/01/70 00:00      
            0xA5 is derivative-depend            01/01/70 00:00      
      Oh no it doesn't            01/01/70 00:00      
   Inverted wishlist            01/01/70 00:00      
      Inverted wishlist            01/01/70 00:00      
         wishlist II.            01/01/70 00:00      
            Loadsa XRAM!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Don't believe all you see...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  because of the taste of vanilla            01/01/70 00:00      
                     chocolate chips            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Unbelievable!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Ridiculous MOVC addressing modes...            01/01/70 00:00      
               MOVC            01/01/70 00:00      
               MOVC Designer.....Your Fired !!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Errr then it's not an 8051 then!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Is it then 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
         AVR???            01/01/70 00:00      
      wishlist continued            01/01/70 00:00      
         low power at slow clock            01/01/70 00:00      
            low power            01/01/70 00:00      
               i am confused!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  But I thought they ARE CMOS!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     quiescent            01/01/70 00:00      
   what I definitely do not want            01/01/70 00:00      
      Right architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         some of us do bits a bit fast            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know but...            01/01/70 00:00      
               all things to all people            01/01/70 00:00      
                  erics last post            01/01/70 00:00      
         RIght Achitecture???            01/01/70 00:00      
      So what do you think about...            01/01/70 00:00      
         ADC/DAC will live forever!            01/01/70 00:00      
            That guy?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Stick            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ability of changing return from interupt            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List