Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/02/05 17:12
Read: times


 
#98702 - not, if you are very sneeky
Responding to: ???'s previous message
You can't use movx,because movx send a data to an address

not, if you are very sneeky
If you do movx @dptr,a with DPH holding your high byte and a holding your low byte and have a 16 bit register connected to P2P0 which is clocked by !WR, you will, in effect, have a synchronous write of 16 bits. This, of course, excludes any possibility of external memory of any kind unless you REALLY go wild with the hardware. You can, however, not read 16 bits by this mechanism.

Erik.

List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Timing Firmware!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Err - read the datasheet!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Err - read the datasheet!            01/01/70 00:00      
         I don't understand the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            dont scare            01/01/70 00:00      
               Jan & Russell            01/01/70 00:00      
                  get a dev board, there is much to learn            01/01/70 00:00      
         simple            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not as simple as you said Jan!            01/01/70 00:00      
               not, if you are very sneeky            01/01/70 00:00      
               ignored address            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thanks Jan            01/01/70 00:00      
   different datasheet            01/01/70 00:00      
   Absolute Maximum Ratings!            01/01/70 00:00      
      3.3V?            01/01/70 00:00      
         3.3 V ??            01/01/70 00:00      
            3.3 V ??            01/01/70 00:00      
               Search Time!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I agree...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Dear mehdi            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           expensive for large amount of production            01/01/70 00:00      
                              expensive for large amount of production            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Issues - not chips            01/01/70 00:00      
               5V to 3.3V solution            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Eh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Andy you are accurate!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  3.9M !!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Answer Is Wrong!!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        that is unsafe and depending on the othe            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I agree...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I'm at a loss            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sorry my mistake ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           rock solid 3.3 to 5            01/01/70 00:00      
         Design decisions.            01/01/70 00:00      
            top-bottom vs. bottom-top            01/01/70 00:00      
   Confidential information?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Andy!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Russell & Jan            01/01/70 00:00      
   0 ohm Resistor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Isn't it obvious?            01/01/70 00:00      
         EVB!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Star Point            01/01/70 00:00      
               Furthermore            01/01/70 00:00      
      common GND            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List