Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/12/08 15:12
Read: times


 
#159976 - You're right, of course, but ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Kai,

The positive effects of high-quality service and support are felt slowly and over time, while the effect of 1200 RMA's, though you've sold only 750 of your legitimate product, is felt immediately and will put you out of business in short order as well.

You can buy "private-brand-labeled (stock-numbered) parts if your volumes are large enough. You can even hide one or two active components between layers of your board, if you're willing and can bear the extra cost, but, as you say, you never have an absolute guarantee your product won't be copied.

It's true, too, that, while your competitor is analyzing, or even copying, your product, you're already working on the next generation. That will work in your favor, but only over time. Unfortunately, the managers often dispose of the designers as soon as the product "works" and has no intention of developing a revision until market forces demand it. I guess they're the copyist's fair prey.

If you mislabel your parts, it will misdirect those considering copying your device. They can figure it out, but it's not so easy. If there are enough disincentives, it begins to work like having a dog discourages burglars. The burglar would rather strike where there's no dog and the window is left unlatched, and the lights are left off. I'm a believer in that strategy. There's a bloodstain beneath one of my windows, where my dog did her job. It's too bad that sort of thing doesn't happen every day. It might discourage burglars.

RE


List of 56 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
89C2051 unlocked and copied            01/01/70 00:00      
   You'll prolly find that the have set the security            01/01/70 00:00      
   CPU Compare            01/01/70 00:00      
   Unlock at89c2051            01/01/70 00:00      
      Proof            01/01/70 00:00      
   Close But Far Away            01/01/70 00:00      
      Several Steps for the Next Product            01/01/70 00:00      
         might I suggest...            01/01/70 00:00      
            anything else would be outright silly.            01/01/70 00:00      
         please explain            01/01/70 00:00      
            try this            01/01/70 00:00      
   an idea            01/01/70 00:00      
      I dont know how this is going.....            01/01/70 00:00      
         the cost of copying            01/01/70 00:00      
            It makes little sense ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Too optimistic ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            another way??            01/01/70 00:00      
            I beg to differ....            01/01/70 00:00      
               protection *scheme*?            01/01/70 00:00      
               I absolutely agree, Michael            01/01/70 00:00      
            COPYING YOUR PROGRAM...            01/01/70 00:00      
               OR            01/01/70 00:00      
      easily fixed with a soldering iron            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some ideas            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:copied software            01/01/70 00:00      
      find out if you want to prove if the code is assem            01/01/70 00:00      
         Excellent point!            01/01/70 00:00      
      legit or not            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: Re: Copied software            01/01/70 00:00      
         A guess            01/01/70 00:00      
   Are you sure            01/01/70 00:00      
      Am I a pirate?            01/01/70 00:00      
         In the US            01/01/70 00:00      
            I don't understand part            01/01/70 00:00      
               The story of Compac Computer.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  an example of legal reverse engineering            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Would this be an example legal reverse engineering            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I can't tell            01/01/70 00:00      
                           find out what the purpose of a patent is            01/01/70 00:00      
   You still did not answer question            01/01/70 00:00      
   Copied software            01/01/70 00:00      
      copying            01/01/70 00:00      
      You cant prove anything            01/01/70 00:00      
   copying products            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sad            01/01/70 00:00      
         but true ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Copying From School Days            01/01/70 00:00      
            What they can do            01/01/70 00:00      
   Oops! See next message!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Style can help            01/01/70 00:00      
   There IS a way to survive            01/01/70 00:00      
      Support, support, support!            01/01/70 00:00      
         You're right, of course, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Nothing more annoying ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, if this is the only "support" he gets from you...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well, there is support and then there's handholding            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List