| ??? 06/26/03 07:06 Read: times |
#49390 - not DRAM ! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"I've used just 32K RAM of an old 386 cache..."
But that, of course, is not DRAM! |
| ??? 06/26/03 07:06 Read: times |
#49390 - not DRAM ! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"I've used just 32K RAM of an old 386 cache..."
But that, of course, is not DRAM! |