| ??? 11/27/04 06:12 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#82057 - Not all UARTs are RS-232! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Should we ask Craig to change all the words "UART" on the forum to the "RS232C protocol" or more precisely to TIA/EIA-232-F or to ITU-T V.24, V.28 and ISO/IEC 2110(:-)? No, because a UART doesn't necessarily have to conform to those standards! 232 is more than just a UART -- it's about voltage signalling levels, addition lines for handshaking, etc etc. The UART is the low-level component. Note that the first letter stands for "Universal," as in, "can be applied in many many many situations" :) -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| serial port/UART/SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:Google first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART/SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More on SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI vs UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That would be I2C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART and SPI, the main difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The real difference... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rs232c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Component vs Protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not all UARTs are RS-232! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 232 is more than just a UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice discussion going | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google not so helpful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI - Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI or SPI?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT: ISO and interfaces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Serial Port - ambiguous! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI STANDARD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Getting back to the original subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Picky, picky,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Chapter & Verse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hayes Commands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice discussion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where is Mohammad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Summary of Buses etc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS232 is NOT a bus! | 01/01/70 00:00 |