??? 11/29/04 06:04 Read: times |
#82145 - Hayes Commands Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Peter:
The links below take you to some of many web pages that describe the common "Hayes Command Set". http://docs.kde.org/en/3.1/kd...mands.html http://www.spiralspider.demon.co.uk/reference.../hayes.htm http://www.its.unimelb.edu.au/InfoSheets/162/ As you can see, not all Hayes commands begin with an A character byte. There is the command AT that is the ATTENTION command that tells a modem that other modem commands follow. This is used at the beginning of a sequence of modem commands that could be many commands long. I am also not sure that it is a general rule that modems will "autobaud" detect off the AT command. Some may and some may not. I don't use a modem much at all anymore and these days almost all modems are the "windows bus modems" where baud rate between the host and the modem is immateral. I do however recall personal experiences in times gone by when a modem that was external on a COMM port had to have the baud rate to the computer set correctly before the modem would accept the "Hayes commands". Later on when MNP 4 and MNP 5 modems came along then the COMM port speed between the modem and the computer was often set to a rate faster than the data rate on the phone line. In some cases this may have allowed a modem to use an autobaud off the AT command but I can also see some old equipment I have laying around that still had baud rate switches on the modem despite the fact that it supported the MNP protocols. Michael Karas |
Topic | Author | Date |
serial port/UART/SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Google first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:Google first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART/SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More on SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI vs UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That would be I2C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART and SPI, the main difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The real difference... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
rs232c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Component vs Protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not all UARTs are RS-232! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
232 is more than just a UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nice discussion going | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Google not so helpful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI - Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI or SPI?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT: ISO and interfaces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Serial Port - ambiguous! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI STANDARD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Getting back to the original subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Picky, picky,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Chapter & Verse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hayes Commands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice discussion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where is Mohammad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Summary of Buses etc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS232 is NOT a bus!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |