| ??? 02/02/05 13:37 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#86374 - NEVER design with typicals Responding to: ???'s previous message |
whether or not this 50ns (max. 200ns)
Payam: If you even consider looking at a "typical" value you are skating on thin ice and getting away from designing and into testing. Ans as we all should know: "succesful testing does not prove the abscence of bugs, it merely prove the abscence of known bugs". If you search here on "equivalent" or "compatible" or "new shipment" you will find enough evidence to prove the above. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| /CE propagaion delay in MAX691 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Prop delay in max691 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Batteries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or check out the FLASH+RAM combination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ZMD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's the one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691+battery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How can that be off topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the matter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's definitely on-topic! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NEVER design with typicals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691 versus MAX691A, leakage currents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| take note, Kai is using the right value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EEprom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more Qs on /CE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is more like a valid question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
timing diagrams | 01/01/70 00:00 |