| ??? 02/04/05 03:08 Read: times |
#86512 - And..... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And that "other" task would handshake with the hosting computer that is sending the data in order to manage the data flow rate during FLASH or EEPROM programming and/or erasing.
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| /CE propagaion delay in MAX691 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Prop delay in max691 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Batteries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or check out the FLASH+RAM combination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ZMD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's the one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691+battery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How can that be off topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the matter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's definitely on-topic! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NEVER design with typicals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691 versus MAX691A, leakage currents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| take note, Kai is using the right value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX691A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EEprom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more Qs on /CE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is more like a valid question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
timing diagrams | 01/01/70 00:00 |



