Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/02/05 14:40
Read: times


 
#86380 - MAX691 versus MAX691A, leakage currents
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Payam said:
MAX691 datasheet page 3 (Electrical Characteristics) says: /CE propagation delay typical time is 50ns.

Take care, there is the MAX691 and the MAX691A. Latter shows a drastically improved propagation delay time of less than 10nsec! This should be small enough for most cases.

he also said:
How long does a typical 3v lithium battery live in a system using MAX691+SRAM+Battery?

There are several points, which affect the battery live. Two are given here:

1. Voltage at inputs of SRAM must show exactly 0V (Vcc pin and !CE input excepted, of course!), otherwise input stages are partially turned-on. But due to leakage current flowing out of inputs (driven by the 3V battery), circuitry connected to inputs will be floated, often resulting in a biasing of protection or parasitic substrate diodes. One way to circumvent this is to connect pull down resistors from these inputs to 0V. Something arround 100kOhm is approriate.
Some people will get long battery life times also without pull-down resistors. But leakage current is highly unpredictable and can drastically decrease life time of battery. So, it might be appropriate to use these pull downs in any case.

2. Very low supply current will only be observed with certain types of SRAMS. You need an LL-type, being optimized for very low data retention supply current. Just to use a standard CMOS RAM can result in a drastically increased supply current.

By the way, do you really need battery backed-up SRAM? Would instead a 28C256 also work?

Kai

List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
/CE propagaion delay in MAX691            01/01/70 00:00      
   Prop delay in max691            01/01/70 00:00      
      Batteries            01/01/70 00:00      
         or check out the FLASH+RAM combination            01/01/70 00:00      
         FRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
            another option            01/01/70 00:00      
               ZMD            01/01/70 00:00      
                  that's the one            01/01/70 00:00      
      MAX691+battery            01/01/70 00:00      
         what is the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   How can that be off topic            01/01/70 00:00      
      the matter            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's definitely on-topic!            01/01/70 00:00      
   NEVER design with typicals            01/01/70 00:00      
   MAX691 versus MAX691A, leakage currents            01/01/70 00:00      
      take note, Kai is using the right value            01/01/70 00:00      
         MAX691A            01/01/70 00:00      
      EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
         EEprom            01/01/70 00:00      
            And.....            01/01/70 00:00      
   more Qs on /CE            01/01/70 00:00      
      This is more like a valid question            01/01/70 00:00      
      timing diagrams            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List