| ??? 04/19/05 16:03 Modified: 04/19/05 16:06 Read: times |
#91940 - I strongly Agree. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I agree with you Jez its better to use 32 bit micros such as ARM's when 8051 isnt enough for the task rather than wasting time with 16bit beasts. In terms of cost and availability also 32bit ARM's are far better than 16bit micros on account of the their high demand. Since ARM is made by so many companies it is very much future proof Even if some company stops ARM production you always have a second source using XA or MCS251 can make you get stuck if Intel or PHILIPS change their mood :)
Regards, Prahlad Purohit |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8 bit , 16 bit 32 bit 8051 - A thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips XA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32 bit is better. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly Agree. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other 32 bit mcu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ARM is there already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments on multisource | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| overhyped - no, misapplied - yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only slightly overhyped | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, multisource is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| name one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it is the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at the tools for Motorola HC08 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeWarrior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Originally it wasn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect protection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit late with that thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| belated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| subliminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs - SATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| revolutionary idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any -current- ones? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single bit processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit-Slice? | 01/01/70 00:00 |