| ??? 04/19/05 16:43 Read: times |
#91943 - other 32 bit mcu Responding to: ???'s previous message |
my point is use of 51 architect & platform for 32 bit due to its large development community. For them switching over will be easy. I don't think designing 32 bit 51 MCU be of so many years work due to availabilty of IC design tools & IP library. Moreover you can see how many manuf are putting money on different 51 variant like fast core , single cycle . There must be good & large market for 51 MCU to focus many manufac attention.
So 32 bit 51 MCU will be also be having large enough market for manuf to put there money in its developement |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8 bit , 16 bit 32 bit 8051 - A thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips XA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32 bit is better. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly Agree. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other 32 bit mcu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ARM is there already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments on multisource | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| overhyped - no, misapplied - yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only slightly overhyped | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, multisource is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| name one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it is the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at the tools for Motorola HC08 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeWarrior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Originally it wasn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect protection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit late with that thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| belated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| subliminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs - SATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| revolutionary idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any -current- ones? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single bit processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit-Slice? | 01/01/70 00:00 |