| ??? 04/19/05 17:40 Read: times |
#91948 - ARM is there already Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Anil Gupta said:
I don't think designing 32 bit 51 MCU be of so many years work... Well, that may or may not be so - but why bother? The ARM already has pretty much the same position in the 32-bit space as the 8051 for 8 bits - it's vendor independant and widely supported. And with the Thumb mode, why would you want any other 16-bit processor? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8 bit , 16 bit 32 bit 8051 - A thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips XA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32 bit is better. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly Agree. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other 32 bit mcu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ARM is there already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments on multisource | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| overhyped - no, misapplied - yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only slightly overhyped | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, multisource is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| name one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it is the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at the tools for Motorola HC08 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeWarrior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Originally it wasn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect protection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit late with that thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| belated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| subliminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs - SATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| revolutionary idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any -current- ones? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single bit processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit-Slice? | 01/01/70 00:00 |