| ??? 04/19/05 17:21 Read: times |
#91946 - a bit late with that thought Responding to: ???'s previous message |
FOr this purpose a alternative is 16/32 bit 51 series architect based MCU
you are a bit late with that thought. I worked on the Philips "16 bit '51", the XA more than 5 years ago. At that time the Intel 251 and the Siemens 16x were available as well. However today, the "new standard" is the ARM. This, however, I am sure, will not lead to the demise of the '51, only the high end derivatives will be in trouble e.g. a SILabs f12x cost more than an ARM. There must be a lesson here: the "old standard" is the '51 (multisource) and the "new standard" is the ARM (multisource). It is my impression and belief that the "16 bit '51"s will never become more than a stopgap. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8 bit , 16 bit 32 bit 8051 - A thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips XA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32 bit is better. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly Agree. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other 32 bit mcu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ARM is there already | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments on multisource | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| overhyped - no, misapplied - yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only slightly overhyped | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, multisource is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| name one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it is the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at the tools for Motorola HC08 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeWarrior | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Originally it wasn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect protection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit late with that thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| belated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| subliminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 bit MCUs - SATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| revolutionary idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any -current- ones? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single bit processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit-Slice? | 01/01/70 00:00 |