??? 06/17/05 20:44 Read: times |
#95211 - probably not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The datasheet says, "4 cycles per instruction byte provides up to 10 MIPS performance at 40 MHz
Which is a bit on the slow side. One clock 40MHz is availabe from more than one source. Also Triscend/Zylogic is a piece of dedicated silicon and - especially after Triscends demise - I am a bit scared of it. I can - should SILabs fold, relatively easy redesign to use the 40MHz oneclockers from Dallas or, when and if that happens a few more speedoos will probably have shown up. A soft core for a FPGA will be useable on more than one manufacturers FPGA, that would not be the case with a Triscend/Zylogic implementation. OK, call me a coward, but I am too scared to go the Zylogic route. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
ASIC '51s and speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Zylogic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
probably not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not look.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Details please? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
T51 limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
t51 limitations,not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so running from RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TCL and all that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other case, probabl same answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
very interesting! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Advantages of single-chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Final thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
better one superfast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pitfall? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multi cpu pitfalls | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hardware delegation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why are you obsesed with zylogic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Obsessed? moi! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, but no thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uPSD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry, no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FYI - Hitex 8051 SoC kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice, will check![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |