Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/28/06 15:20
Modified:
  09/28/06 15:20

Read: times


 
#125292 - the whole thread seems a waste of effort
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It's pretty clear the system requirements haven't been considered adequately. For code security, there's that encryption array. Maxim/Dallas has some "secure" mircos that have enhanced security features. They also have some really fast (1x) parts as opposed to various 6x or 4x parts.

So far, there's been no explanation of why the simple BRG based on the 11.0592 MHz crystal is desirable, as opposed, say, to 19.6608 or 24.576.

There's been a really silly explanation of why a large address space is desirable. Surely that's not the driving factor.

Maybe the O/P has realized that and is actually thinking about his requirements.

We should never lose sight of the fact that requirements are things without which the system will fail. Nothing that's not required should be included in the design criteria.

RE


List of 46 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
what next after 8051?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Should be in Chat!            01/01/70 00:00      
      ARM7            01/01/70 00:00      
         not 5-volts!            01/01/70 00:00      
            not 5 volts?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not exactly ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  "real-world" or "old-world"?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     can't deny it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      chat            01/01/70 00:00      
         No, not that chat!            01/01/70 00:00      
   DS80C390            01/01/70 00:00      
   Current processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      after 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
         Nothing to do with ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why 8051?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Crystal            01/01/70 00:00      
            Crystal            01/01/70 00:00      
               You didn't answer the question!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  some thoughts            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Needs more thought!            01/01/70 00:00      
               you say you need performance, are you even thin            01/01/70 00:00      
                  only 20MHz in the 6-clock mode            01/01/70 00:00      
                     only 20MHz in the 6-clock mode            01/01/70 00:00      
                        yeah...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not QUITE hopeless            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the whole thread seems a waste of effort            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Understatement!            01/01/70 00:00      
         you might want to stick to '51... or not...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why that crystal frequency?            01/01/70 00:00      
   that is SOME design            01/01/70 00:00      
      Strange Design            01/01/70 00:00      
         an example            01/01/70 00:00      
            bugger..            01/01/70 00:00      
               They had an 8-pin and a 14-pin PIC, didn't they?            01/01/70 00:00      
   ALL of the above is a pie in the sky            01/01/70 00:00      
      Maybe it is for a PABX?            01/01/70 00:00      
      DS80C390            01/01/70 00:00      
         I thought that, too. Why dig deeper?            01/01/70 00:00      
            What does Sandeep Gupta say?            01/01/70 00:00      
               8051 >>> ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Look at the code before changing cpu            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Sandeep Gupta must be a manager            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Blinded by the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
      5V ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, that's interesting!            01/01/70 00:00      
   have you considered a multiprocessor            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List