??? 10/10/08 21:25 Read: times |
#158965 - AT89LP2052 has HW SPI Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rather than the 89C2051, you need the AT89LP2052 which has HW SPI.
Then, you can certainly do a slave SPI quite easily. If speed was not a issue, you could implement an INT based SW SPI, but it would have to be clocked slowly by the remote master to ensure the INT had time to read/write the MISO/MISO on each clock edge. - Given that is a lot of work, and non-trivial for a learner, why not just swap in a AT89LP2052/4052 (or one of their other LP216/LP828 etc.) Atmel have a simulator, (and a OCD debugger coming) for this family. |
Topic | Author | Date |
SPI slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
high speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sory for late replay. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not sure.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the worst possible approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI Slave Response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
further explanation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fixed speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI Timing Diagrams | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART Mode 0 - SPI like Serial Shif register | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uhm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to joe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
your point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you can't fail with software master | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unanswerable! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Intended for/usable for not always identical | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
consideration? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
whichever you choose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
low cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you do not use an interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
polling? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bits/s not packet size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bits/s not packet size! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
500ms? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes - I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not complex - just requiring low baudrate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kind of rcorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Complexity contra recommendable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as i said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
lots of them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mcu with spi, right here in the thread![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CodeArchitect. ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ahhh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
simulating SS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interrupts are slower than tight polling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all about worst-case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
missed interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correct me.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fast interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An Alternative... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some Descriptive Information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89LP2052 has HW SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 |