??? 12/16/04 13:38 Read: times |
#83233 - I doubt it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Should the customer want to change something himself he could reprogram it in basic.
I doubt very much that the "customer" we are talking about has any knowledge of basic. (S)he will, of course, have no knowledge of ladder logic either. However arguing basic vs ladder require the customer knowing either. The reverse argument goes for industrial equipment wher there is a broad knowledge of ladder and virtually none of basic. Should the order increase from qty 1 to qty 10 ... All PLC suggestions have been prefaced with "qty 1" Editorializing: Many of us did/do forget about the cost of time. While time may be "free" for an amateur, Ronan indicate he is making this thing for money. He may, of course, still consider his time "free", but that is the sure way to ruin. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 controlling switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Medical Device?!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
51 probably really controlling switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe it is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... although ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
elementary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Crouzet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SAmple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PCB ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends on circumstances, I said. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pictures in the post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I doubt it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PLC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MII | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re:MII | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switch or Relay? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wrote this is not pro... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you forgot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Repeating myself... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
plc cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
...includes case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make the bet! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not bet, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No compilation, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Basic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC 52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh yes you would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC does not need line numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It was nice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It was 10 years ago... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
line numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC for ADuC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:Basic52![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Totally agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ladder logic ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ladder | 01/01/70 00:00 |