??? 12/16/04 15:24 Read: times |
#83252 - BASIC 52 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jacob,
There is a variant of BASIC that used to be burned on the 8052AH-BASIC, now long dropeed by Intel, but open sourced by them. YOu can get it from various sources, and it has been fixed, modified and extended by various folks, like Elektor who released version 1.3 of it. There is an 80C320 version too. A 8052basic needed RAM, but incorporated enough firmware to burn its own eproms on board, and then set the system to run automatically from ROM when rebooted. You could extend the BASIC yourself too. And it had 8 digit FP support. It was very powerful for the 8K footprint, but rather slow when talking to peripherals, where you had to srop into assembler, which wasn't terribly easy to link in. Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 controlling switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Medical Device?!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
51 probably really controlling switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe it is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... although ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
elementary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Crouzet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SAmple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PCB ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends on circumstances, I said. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pictures in the post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I doubt it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PLC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MII | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re:MII | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Switch or Relay? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is a PLC an overkill for this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wrote this is not pro... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you forgot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Repeating myself... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
plc cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
...includes case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make the bet! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not bet, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No compilation, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Basic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC 52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh yes you would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC does not need line numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It was nice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It was 10 years ago... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
line numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BASIC for ADuC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:Basic52![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Totally agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ladder logic ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ladder | 01/01/70 00:00 |