??? 02/07/05 05:03 Read: times |
#86709 - SMS ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
is simply not professional.
If you expect to be taken seriously, as a professional, you must present yourself as one. And this presentation includes communicating using the rules of language, not some shorthand used by teenagers. -a |
Topic | Author | Date |
[OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |