| ??? 02/08/05 02:50 Read: times |
#86861 - Ah... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oh ok, thanks. I had never heard the definition of this term before.
So could you say that everyone's use of the "SMS" acronym in this thread constitutes an undesirable use of SMS since it should actually be spelled out as "Short Message Service"? ;) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| [OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |