| ??? 02/07/05 17:00 Read: times |
#86775 - excluding people Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If I would have a question, than I want as many answers as possible.
So I would never exclude people, which are not so familiar with the English language or SMS language. But it is only your decision if you want to decrease the number of answers. So saving 2 second on asking may cause 2 weeks of trouble shooting, because not the right answer was received. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| [OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |