??? 02/08/05 14:02 Read: times |
#86902 - re:SMS Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Payam,
If you don't like the SMS rule, then don't ask any questions. Nobody is twisting your arm to post your questions on this forum. As for me when I see a post with SMS in it and I don't get what they are trying to ask, I ignore that post and that is what I suggest the other senior members of this forum should do also. Jacob |
Topic | Author | Date |
[OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |