??? 02/07/05 14:01 Read: times |
#86746 - As an aside Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
It may be acceptable for older style cell phone communications where a limited keyboard was available.
Bear in mind that SMS messages are limited to 160 characters, and cost 10-20 cents a piece to send. Brevity is important in THAT context. Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
[OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |