| ??? 02/08/05 06:01 Read: times |
#86863 - Re: Payam Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Guy Lavoie said:
Oh ok, thanks. I had never heard the definition of this term before. Did you note that many people are out there who does not even understand what is 'SMS'? That's why it is discouraged here. Bruce Mckenney had alo quoted a good example. Payam said: But you seem to have "accepted" these technical info as a "feeder hand". Well it's a good idea not to bite then. Well, I have thousands of words to say on this topic but don't want to start an argument here so I think let's stop any further discussion on this topic. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| [OT] SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reasons not to use SMS-isms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Language - doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ambiguity (a case study) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Is For Lazy People | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well put, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Imagine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No problem @ all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Helping hands deserve Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ijaz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Payam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same here ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: same here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you got that one wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excluding people | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reason for SMS Prohibition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What exactly is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SMS Text Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perhaps I'm old fashioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternate definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 |