Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/27/05 20:29
Read: times


 		 #96051 - Not quite the same
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Bartosz Wucke said:
I'm just stating a simple truth: For the customer, a closed-source program is a product of lower value than identical in all other respects open-source alternative - strictly because of levels of maintainablity and control from the customer side


Erik Malund said:
That is noyt a "simple truth" but a "simple falsehood".

How many have switched or wanted to switch from Keil to SDCC?
how many have switched or wanted to switch from SDCC to Keil?


That's not quite a fair comparison since Keil and SDCC are not "identical in all other respects."

I would tend to agree that, all things being equal, an open source option that is identical to a closed-source option is going to be more attractive. At best, the source code is available. At worst, the customer doesn't want it. But I can't imagine that if Keil Software were to offer the source code to their compiler with every license at no added cost that most people would decline, or would be less inclined to buy Keil because the code was available.

On the other hand, some non-zero number of customers would probably take them up on it.

The only question is whether it makes business sense to open up the code since opening up the source code would make their package available to some non-zero number of leeches that want a professional compiler for free.

But in terms of what the customer wants, the customer almost always wants more... not less. And source code is "more."

Regards,
Craig Steiner


List of 55 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
finally the trade press recognizes            01/01/70 00:00      
   Amen            01/01/70 00:00      
   How many seniors write 'good' code?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I wonder            01/01/70 00:00      
         Definition of Good            01/01/70 00:00      
            Good            01/01/70 00:00      
      you are wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
         Still depends.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Strong words!!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Russell            01/01/70 00:00      
               this little quirk.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  if only            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Well            01/01/70 00:00      
                        correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Well then            01/01/70 00:00      
                              There's the crux            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Niches            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Oh, but yes!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    no way            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       By whom then?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Bartosz, your ramblings are not about ma            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             And then            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                The issue discussed is not open or close            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Fair enough            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Mandatory?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      WGASA            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Closed source            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Yes.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      simple falsehood            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Not quite the same            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Oh, well            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Is that the point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          PHBs don't care            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Worse            01/01/70 00:00      
            Pretty normal really...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Donald            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Whats the difference ?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Maintainable            01/01/70 00:00      
            Erik, You've yet to convince me!            01/01/70 00:00      
               I bid you peace            01/01/70 00:00      
               HLL perhaps?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Some code does not need to be maintained            01/01/70 00:00      
            oh it is            01/01/70 00:00      
               now..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OOPS            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:trade press            01/01/70 00:00      
   an afterthought            01/01/70 00:00      
      Maintainability Vs functionability            01/01/70 00:00      
         Maint.vs functionality, design vs test            01/01/70 00:00      
            Design is not everything.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Maintainable Vs Robust code            01/01/70 00:00      
               maintainaibility is a cost saver            01/01/70 00:00      
   averagosity; job security; survivability            01/01/70 00:00      
      If bad code gives Job Security then Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
         neither have I            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List