| hardware setup of AT89C51ED2 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RTFM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| board's setup | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| has been discussed | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| AT89C51ED2 in ISP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| no 'unique' schematc needed | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| thanks joel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
|
I sent for your email the schematic! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| FLIP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| sample code | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| program in assembly? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| sample code in c | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ISP without MAX232 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| that old gem again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A gem is always a gem | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it does not help that you respond s..t a | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: ISP without MAX232 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| To stop an urban legend ... seems imposs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| just for the sake of argument ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| very clearly stated | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's GREEN cheese! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| from old time... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| there you go | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How about the 1488/1489? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this all started with | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| well, I read that, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the standard still deserves a look | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| reminds me of the burden cap argument. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RS232 without -V explained | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There is two ways to do things: by desig | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Do never do | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Answer in shematic of your post | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I wouldn't rely on that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| true, if you have no noise margin worrie | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What??? You imply the 1489 won't work? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what is a 1489? and what is the issue | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's what we used before the Max-xxxx | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| who said 'require'? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I think you're dreaming. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes, I 'dream' noise immunity | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and you're prepared to show ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I can't | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Try this link | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I hope the datasheet is wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nope, it isn't wrong ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Another gem? Well explained! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| so, now the crap is "justifued" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| hy do you keep beating a desd horse | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm not the one doing the beating | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I never said that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Hysteresis, ... sure ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Interesting ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Just wait, next time it may very | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you keep hammering 'needed' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No, in fact you haven't | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| standard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Of course I adhere to standards | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I did not make the standard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| As long as you're arguing with me ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I directly quoted you, so who started th | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Erik, you need some practice | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That should settle it, you get your chip | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Chill brothers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Time for a rendezvous | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| to the two above | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Where's the science? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| science | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
